Share
Easily share your videos with everyone, public or private
Watch
Better than TV! Watch what you want, when you want!
Upload
Quickly upload and tag videos in almost any video format
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    95
    Default Upper arm growth?
    Just wondering how much size I can gain in upper arms (Bi's + Tri's together) in a year? assuming that you are eating enough calories to exceed your BMR+activity level to promote growth, and not over training the muscle groups. assuming that the individual has 1-2 years weight training experiance.

    Is 1-2 inches/year about right? more? less?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Baghdad
    Posts
    9,673
    Default
    If you want to add an inch to your arms, the unwritten rule is gain 10lbs of muscle mass.

    Obviously some people will have better gains and others will have less gains.

    Stick to lifting heavy weight and eating the right food and the growth will come.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    961
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Thompson
    Just wondering how much size I can gain in upper arms (Bi's + Tri's together) in a year? assuming that you are eating enough calories to exceed your BMR+activity level to promote growth, and not over training the muscle groups. assuming that the individual has 1-2 years weight training experiance.

    Is 1-2 inches/year about right? more? less?

    Genetics and intensity will determine this and finding out what works best for you. you need to focus on learning your body.

  4. #4
    Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    95
    Default
    Thanks for the replies, that answers my question.

  5. #5
    Novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    91
    Default
    I have ained 17lbs of lean mass. My max bench has gone from 185 to 335 in two years. I can deadlift 450 or do triples at 415. The leg press, calf machine, and any back machines are a joke because i can rep out with the full stack (more then 15 reps) I havent put on even 1/4 inch on my arms. They look better because the shape has improved and i have less fat covering then. There stuck at 16.5 in. im 43 by the way

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Geordie Land
    Posts
    982
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by jstarr37
    I have ained 17lbs of lean mass. My max bench has gone from 185 to 335 in two years. I can deadlift 450 or do triples at 415. The leg press, calf machine, and any back machines are a joke because i can rep out with the full stack (more then 15 reps) I havent put on even 1/4 inch on my arms. They look better because the shape has improved and i have less fat covering then. There stuck at 16.5 in. im 43 by the way
    This is probs because the muscle you've gained has replaced the fat you've lost on your arms resulting in minimal visual growth but a better shape .

  7. #7
    V E T E R A N!!!!
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Private forums!
    Posts
    4,969
    Default
    10-15 lbs usually equates to 1 inch like easto said....but... the bigger your arms are the more lbs you have to gain to add an inch.

  8. #8
    Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    95
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by jstarr37
    I have ained 17lbs of lean mass. My max bench has gone from 185 to 335 in two years. I can deadlift 450 or do triples at 415. The leg press, calf machine, and any back machines are a joke because i can rep out with the full stack (more then 15 reps) I havent put on even 1/4 inch on my arms. They look better because the shape has improved and i have less fat covering then. There stuck at 16.5 in. im 43 by the way
    those are some impresive gains. keep up the good work

    just wondering, whats the prefered method of measureing the arms? flexed across the peak, or arm straight out non flexed?

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,380
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Thompson View Post
    those are some impresive gains. keep up the good work

    just wondering, whats the prefered method of measureing the arms? flexed across the peak, or arm straight out non flexed?
    Usually when people say "I have 18" arms" or "I have 20" arms"...they're usually measuring flexed at the peak. Me personally to track my arm growth, I measure cold/relaxed straight down by my side b/c that will show if they're growing.

  10. #10
    Educated Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    897
    Default
    I'll say it again and again if you want big arms train tri's harder and take it easy on the bi's! my bi's get very little work since I do them on back day. I train tris pretty hard and my arms are my best asset!

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •