Share
Easily share your videos with everyone, public or private
Watch
Better than TV! Watch what you want, when you want!
Upload
Quickly upload and tag videos in almost any video format
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Amateur Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    888
    Default Concerned about UA(urine analysis). Help.
    Would nolva or m1t show up in a UA? If so, what as? How long would it take to get out of your system?
    Sorry, I'm new to all this, but am having to take a UA next week and am concerned about stuff showing up.

  2. #2
    Junior Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    294
    Default
    i have heard they dont test for nolvadex (assuming this is for sports)

    how long ago did you stop the m1t?

  3. #3
    Armchair Scientist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    670
    Default
    m1t should - it would likely have the same detection time as dianabol ~ 5 weeks.

  4. #4
    Amateur Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    888
    Default
    Actually am still taking the M1T(will be my 4th week). Was more concerned about the nolva(haven't taken yet, but will start the end of this week as pct after i'm off m1t).Also have 6oxo on hand in case nolva showed up on ua, but would feel much better if I could use nolva. Don't have much faith in 6oxo. Guess my ua isn't this week, but next week. Still doesn't leave me much time if m1t shows up. Maybe could use something to flush my system? ANy suggestions? Thanks.
    PS: the drug test isn't for sports, its a requirement for this new job I applied for. So I don't know what all they'd test for. Prob. THC, coke, meth, etc. etc. WHo knows they might also test for steriods. So am kinda worried. Appriciate any help. Thanks

  5. #5
    Armchair Scientist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    670
    Default
    Theres a good chance they wont test for androgens then. Usually its just opiates, narcotics, THC, amphetamines, barbituates, and hallucinogens.

  6. #6
    Amateur Bodybuilder
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    888
    Default
    So if that was the case I'd be fine, but if they do i'm screwed? I shouldn't be at any risk by taking the nolva in either case though? Even if they do test for anabolics? Thanks.

  7. #7
    Armchair Scientist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    670
    Default
    nah - you should definitely be fine with nolva - its not even a controlled substance. the m1t tests positive for androgens, so you are screwed even though it is legal.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,107
    Default
    Go with the nolva.
    Cant tou say (if it shows on the m1t) that its a pro-hormone.. its legal for you guys aint it?

  9. #9
    Armchair Scientist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    670
    Default
    No - there is no way to distiguish prohormones from hormones.

  10. #10
    War Eagle
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    2,685
    Default
    If I were you I wouldn't be too worried. A year and a half ago I was coming off a cycle of Sustanon and Deca and had just finished my PCT when I had to undergo a hair sample Drug test. The test was for an extremely large Computer Consulting corporation with tight security and I passed with flying colors. If I had to guess I would say they are not testing for Anabolics or Androgens, more like the substances you listed above. Good Luck!!!

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Your girlfriends mouth!!
    Posts
    315
    Default
    I don't know for sure, but I've heard that companies don't test for androgens on their UA's because of the expense. Supposedly it's VERY expensive to test for steroids. Like I said, I'm not sure, but if it was me, I wouldn't sweat it.

  12. #12
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6
    Default
    Junior College athletics don't test for anabolics, just street drugs. The test at my juinor college was rumored to cost in the range of 800-1000 dollars. Just not practical to spend 10,000 bucks every month to test 10 football players.

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •